About HKTDC | Media Room | Contact HKTDC | Wish List Wish List () | My HKTDC |
Save As PDF Print this page

Forced Labour Risk Management Principles Recommended for Importers

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has posted to its website a list of recommended business practices to address the risk of forced labour in global supply chains. 19 USC 1307 prohibits the importation of goods mined, produced or manufactured, wholly or in part, in any foreign country by forced labour, including convict labour, forced child labour and indentured labour. Such goods are subject to exclusion and/or seizure and may lead to criminal investigation of the importer. The Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 closed a loophole in this law that had allowed imports of certain forced labour-produced goods if they were not produced domestically in such quantities as to meet consumptive demands. When information reasonably indicates that violative goods are being imported CBP may issue withhold release orders against those goods.

CBP encourages stakeholders to closely examine their supply chains to ensure that imported goods are not mined, produced or manufactured, wholly or in part, with prohibited forms of labour; i.e., slave, convict, forced child or indentured labour. To that end, the agency has recommended the U.S. Department of Labor’s Comply Chain principles for creating a social compliance system as a best business practice.

Comprehensive Supply Chain Profile

  • Does the U. S. importer have a comprehensive understanding of the natural supply chain from sourcing of raw materials to subcontracting manufacturing to the assembly of finished goods destined for the United States?
  • With respect to its products, has the U.S. importer conducted a comprehensive risk assessment of forced labour in the global supply chain and conducted onsite production visits to the factory, farm or mine for high-risk countries?
  • Is the U.S. importer engaged with industry specific multi-stakeholder initiatives?

Written Code of Conduct

  • Has the U.S. importer developed and applied a formal written code of conduct for all international interactions associated with the sourcing of foreign goods?
  • Is the code of conduct shared with all suppliers in the global supply chain as a stand-alone document or as addendums to purchase orders, contracts or letters of credit?
  • Does the code of conduct include specific language as to minimum labour standards as specified by the International Labour Organisation, other intergovernmental organisations or multi-stakeholder initiatives?

Robust Internal Control Process

  • Are the internal controls established according to professionally recognized objective audit standards?
  • Does the U.S. importer have sufficient internal controls in place to effectively deter and detect instances of non-compliance with the code of conduct and other best practices?
  • Does the U.S. importer conduct periodic compliance audits using in-house personnel or external audit professionals?
  • Does the U.S. importer’s internal control process cover every level of the product supply chain including relevant business documents?
  • Does the U.S. importer have adequate corrective action plans to address non-compliance and deter weak business practices?
Content provided by Picture: HKTDC Research
Comments (0)
Shows local time in Hong Kong (GMT+8 hours)

HKTDC welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers.
Review our Comment Policy

*Add a comment (up to 5,000 characters)