About HKTDC | Media Room | Contact HKTDC | Wish List Wish List () | My HKTDC |
Save As PDF Email this page Print this page
Qzone

Lawmakers Complain About Lack of Action under Strengthened Trade Remedy Law

In a 21 March letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, a bi-partisan group of 20 senators expressed concern that the DOC is not applying the Leveling the Playing Field Act, which was signed into law in June 2015, as Congress intended. Specifically, the senators urged the DOC to apply adverse facts available in AD and CV duty cases in which a foreign company or government does not co-operate.

According to the letter, foreign respondents have litigated the use of AFA in recent years, making the DOC more reluctant to employ it. In response, Section 502 of Public Law 114-27 seeks to restore the strength and effectiveness of AFA and protect it from legal challenge by (i) establishing that the DOC is not required to try to determine what an AD or CV duty rate would be if a respondent had provided information in the investigation, (ii) explicitly stating that the DOC does not have to corroborate any AD or CV duty applied and has the discretion to apply the highest AD or CV duty rates in a proceeding, and (iii) making clear that the DOC is not required to prove that the AD or CV duty rate used in the investigation reflects the commercial reality of the respondent.

Congress enacted these provisions to ensure that domestic manufacturers and their employees “get the relief they deserve from unfair trading practices,” the senators said, and the DOC “should use AFA when foreign producers or governments do not cooperate in preliminary or final investigations, including the use of dilatory tactics.” Failure to do so, they warned, “allows trade cheats to get away with violating international trade law and prevents American manufacturers from competing on a level playing field.”

Content provided by Picture: HKTDC Research
Comments (0)
Shows local time in Hong Kong (GMT+8 hours)

HKTDC welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers.
Review our Comment Policy

*Add a comment (up to 5,000 characters)